Our underlying heirarchy is similar to a Gantt Chart - but with a few more types of Bars.
Like a typical Gantt Chart, ACTIVITY and SUMMARY bars aggregate into higher level SUMMARY bars.
After inspecting a high level SUMMARY bar's associated Probability Fan, you can drill down to inspect the Probability Fans for the ACTIVITY and SUMMARY bars that made up that aggregate.
By looking at the Probability Fans for each contributing component, you can determine likely sources of risk in the aggregate SUMMARY bar, and with that knowledge, determine methods to mitigate unacceptable levels of risk - or improve reward.
Each
Bar on our Gantt-like chart contains a NOTES field.
The NOTES field allows users to enter annotations tracking:
So, you don't like some of the assumptions, and, the plan is too simplistic.
If you were running our software, you could build the plan with your assumptions, meeting the complexity of your product launch.
Your product launch Gantt-like chart would have 1000 bars with multiple sub-levels - no problem. We handle complex risk analysis better than anyone. We're fast and accurate .
Would the sources of cost, risk, and reward then be visible?
Would the effects of timing on future profits and risk be visible?
Given this level of visibility to risk, reward, and timing:
would you go forward with your product launch?
What changes would you make to shorten timing?
Now that risk is visible - what could you do to mitigate risk?
How could you increase profits?
With this level of visibility in you planning, could you sell the project to the board?